Guild Wars Forums - GW Guru
 
 

Go Back   Guild Wars Forums - GW Guru > The Inner Circle > The Riverside Inn

Notices

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old Jan 11, 2008, 05:47 AM // 05:47   #301
Ascalonian Squire
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Advertisement

Disable Ads
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by i am a princess
you know something, why in the hell create a game when they know their's so much stuff going to happen to it. it's like saying Bill Gates banning everyone in the entire world for using or hacking window's, its perthetic. do you honestly think that every hacker in the world could get caught by the authoritys
Hacking your own version of windows doesn't affect a virtual economy and cause inflation of prices, making it difficult for people who don't cheat, or don't know how, to compete. It also gives the hackers an unfair advantage in the game. And it's just against the EULA. Even if you somehow win it's a stupid bureaucratic rule, those rules are part of the game, and have to be followed.
Destroyer1717 is offline  
Old Jan 11, 2008, 05:47 AM // 05:47   #302
Furnace Stoker
 
Crom The Pale's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Guild: Ageis Ascending
Profession: W/
Default

A wise man once stated the simple fact that people lie.

That is why Anet is looking back at all the logs to see exactly who went to the outpost and used the exploit and how many times they did. You can scream till your blue in the face that it was only once, but if they have logs that say otherwise then you might as well just admit the truth.

This was an exploit, claiming that you "tested" it then never went back or profited from it so you should not be banned won't fly if your "tests" concisted of 100 runs.

You broke the rules and got caught, telling the cop that you were just keeping up with traffic won't make the speeding ticket go away!
Crom The Pale is offline  
Old Jan 11, 2008, 05:48 AM // 05:48   #303
Academy Page
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Guild: Mika Nakashima (Mika)
Profession: A/
Default

yeah if was still posted in monkey's little house i'd show gaile or andrew partick gladly but i can't i'm banned but again just get an alt support the game still its fun we just f-ed up and btw anyone want a char full of reavers i got a lot of them
chaoticimajar is offline  
Old Jan 11, 2008, 05:48 AM // 05:48   #304
Ascalonian Squire
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: IOWA
Guild: swat
Profession: Mo/
Default

Im not playing this game becuase they will just have another glitch out that will get more and more rare items and people banned from the game and before long all that will be left is people that dont know nothing and just come on once a week to play guildwars screw that you can only temp a person so much before they get real desperate and actually want that super rare item from the game that goes for 100k 250ectos and give in and exploit the games vulnerabilities.
Azarr#1 is offline  
Old Jan 11, 2008, 05:50 AM // 05:50   #305
Academy Page
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Canada
Default

well lets just do a little 6th grade math.
Lets say all these ppl had 3 games and 1 expansion thats like 50$ each so 200$(more if you have CE's)

so 117x200$= 23400$ Anet just basiclly stole.

minus 200 from that final because there was ONLY 1 person who Hacked GW.

I'm pretty sure Anet has just lost that many characters for GW2....

Done Rant THANK YOU ANET I'm going to buy WoW now. seems better
Arch the is offline  
Old Jan 11, 2008, 05:51 AM // 05:51   #306
Lion's Arch Merchant
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: New Mexico
Guild: GWEN
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by truzo 117
dude, you still dont get it, THERE WAS NO HACKING the first guy to find out about it was by accident, no hacks. found by playing the game as normal
I think you are missleading this. The past couple of updates that carry the same wording about being able to access areas without previously being there from guild hall was a bug. That was not the exploit they got banned for.

What happened is that someone noticed a bug 5 months ago, hacked the gw.exe file and entered into a seperate outpost where they could go anywhere in the game. That of course, chained to other people. Then the exploit grew to where anyone could do it. It required a hack for the initial phase. Thats why there was banning for this. There was no banning for the bug over the past wintersday.
Gattocheese is offline  
Old Jan 11, 2008, 05:52 AM // 05:52   #307
ArenaNet
 
Gaile Gray's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Error of My Ways
Are you honestly joking? The area in the post that I bolded is exactly what I am describing to Guild Wars Support. If the ban requirements are the way you say they are I would NOT be banned right now. But I lost 6000 hours of hard work because I tested the exploit, reported my findings directly to support (2 days before it got leaked onto Guru), deleted all of my items I received while testing, and removed my characters from the outpost.
PM me your user name. No, not your password, just your user name, or the name of the character with which you "tested." Because I have the list in front of me and I'm happy to check.

Quote:
Originally Posted by shiznid12
If this is the case, please inform me why I was banned? I've only had 1 character able to ever enter the Mallyx outpost, so I never used multiple characters.
You can go ahead and PM me your char name, too, if you wish.

But have you both written Support? Only they can rescind a ban, and they have a lot of detailed information on each banned account.
__________________
Gaile Gray
Support Liaison
ArenaNet

Last edited by Gaile Gray; Jan 11, 2008 at 05:54 AM // 05:54..
Gaile Gray is offline  
Old Jan 11, 2008, 05:52 AM // 05:52   #308
Ascalonian Squire
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Azarr#1
Im not playing this game becuase they will just have another glitch out that will get more and more rare items and people banned from the game and before long all that will be left is people that dont know nothing and just come on once a week to play guildwars screw that you can only temp a person so much before they get real desperate and actually want that super rare item from the game that goes for 100k 250ectos and give in and exploit the games vulnerabilities.
umm... that doesn't even make sense. 117 people got banned out of hundreds of thousands... that's not even .1% of players... and it's not hard to not do something illegal you know, considering 99.9% of people do it. And everyone won't be banned, simply because it would be terrible rep for ANet outside of the community (which continually grows more and more hostile).
Destroyer1717 is offline  
Old Jan 11, 2008, 05:53 AM // 05:53   #309
Frost Gate Guardian
 
Cuthroat Dibbler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: UK
Guild: Lore School
Profession: Me/
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chaoticimajar
katie wants her ghoslty off her account can you unban it
I rest my case.... Items are disappearing from the game!!!

I seriously hope ANet are true to their promise and ban by IP where poss to prevent multi acct holder reaping the rewards of this. However, its already clear that as these guys have active 2nd/3rd maybe more accts ... the damage is waaaay beyond done and its NOT going to stop in a hurry....

Last edited by Cuthroat Dibbler; Jan 11, 2008 at 05:55 AM // 05:55..
Cuthroat Dibbler is offline  
Old Jan 11, 2008, 05:53 AM // 05:53   #310
Ascalonian Squire
 
pochoWICKED's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Guild: [GoA]
Profession: Mo/
Default

Yea I've accepted it now.
We messed up.
You Can all learn from our mistakes.
Good Luck to the rest of you.

<<<<<<Btw i changed my avatar
pochoWICKED is offline  
Old Jan 11, 2008, 05:54 AM // 05:54   #311
Jungle Guide
 
Mickey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Guild: Eternal Insight
Profession: D/
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gaile Gray
PM me your user name. No, not your password, just your user name, or the name of the character with which you "tested." Because I have the list in front of me and I'm happy to check.
I just sent you a plethora of emails describing what I think may be a mathematical error on your part, a much more accurate test would be to see how many times a member or user has opened the Mallyx Chest, of the 117 banned.
Mickey is offline  
Old Jan 11, 2008, 05:56 AM // 05:56   #312
Jungle Guide
 
Mickey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Guild: Eternal Insight
Profession: D/
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gaile Gray
PM me your user name. No, not your password, just your user name, or the name of the character with which you "tested." Because I have the list in front of me and I'm happy to check.

You can go ahead and PM me your char name, too, if you wish.

But have you both written Support? Only they can rescind a ban, and they have a lot of detailed information on each banned account.
I've written to Support, I get the same response, Account has been used to take advantage multiple times, which is true. I just contacted all the friends I gave items to via their forums. 7 items. 7 Mallyx Items. I don't know if Support can detect how many times the chest has been opened, but the only char ever used was my Ranger, and she did it 7 times. 7. Not 24.
Mickey is offline  
Old Jan 11, 2008, 05:57 AM // 05:57   #313
Wilds Pathfinder
 
1 up and 2 down's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Profession: Rt/
Default

Maybe you club 117ers don't know, but you are pulling a Chunky Monkey.

In case you don't know who he is. Chucky was one of the leading dupers in the armbrace incident. He swore up and down that he was innocent until Max Gladius came along and posted a screenie of Chunky offering him 7 stacks of armbraces.

So, just like Chunky, I know you guys that were banned are just lieing and not telling the truth.

Last edited by 1 up and 2 down; Jan 12, 2008 at 03:59 AM // 03:59..
1 up and 2 down is offline  
Old Jan 11, 2008, 06:02 AM // 06:02   #314
Pre-Searing Cadet
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Guild: GoL
Profession: E/Me
Default A Response From One of the 117

I will share several bits of information, and then will read the other pages in the forum. But let me answer some of the many comments being offered here, all based on the position that was really pretty clearly detailed in today's Dev Update:
----And then let me respond with my two bits of info.

No one was banned for visiting the hidden outpost once. No one was banned even for going there a few times.
----Not even the whistleblower who said he was banned after only doing it once or a "few times"? I smell a liar.. too bad I can't tell who it is..

No one was banned for entering the mission, killing Mallyx, and taking the loot, even if they did that a few times.
----Ok, so what constitutes a "few times"? 5? 10? 3? 6? I mean, what is your baseline for this ban? If you are going to play judge, jury, and executioner.. you should at least inform the populace of the actual law being implemented. Just some food for thought.

In fact, the bar was set higher than a one-time or even few-time occurrence, as the Dev Update states, to avoid banning someone who was pulled there inadvertently or to avoid banning someone who might have thought he was helping by "testing" the exploit.
----Which goes back to banning the whistleblower. Who is telling the truth? After dealing with some people through the random support services I'm honeslty not sure who to trust. And why avoid banning people inadvertantly? Hasn't ever stopped y'all in the past. Humans you think are bots. Nine Squares victims. Any of those ring a bell?

We have had protests saying something like, "But I only did it 4 times!"And the answer is, "You're right: You used the exploit 4 times. And then you used the exploit 20 more times on your other character."
----And for those that actually told the truth? Those that did it 4 times? What did they get? A swift kick in the tail and a "Sorry, this is for the best of the gaming community! Thanks for the $200 commitment! Later!" A-Net

There is a massive difference between ferrying someone to a known map and hacking the client to go to an inaccessible map, to take on a hero without having had to fight through four difficult challenges prior to that meeting. For in normal circumstances, by the time a party gets to Mallyx, they've taken damage, acquired DP, and spent a significant amount of time. The DoA mission requires talent, skill, and dedication. What challenge is there in skipping to the end scene? And would anyone honestly think that such a short-cut was allowed or intended?
----Oh, absolute b.s! DoA requires no talent, skill, or dedication anymore. You know why? Ursan and consumables! You all at A-Net have continually made the game easier to farm, easier to beat, and easier to... exploit. People do the entire DoA in under 2 hours now thanks to the systems put in place on your end. It is the bed that A-Net has made. So don't try to get by with the difficulty rant. It is useless at best.

----And of course it wasn't allowed or intended. Nor was Duncan. Nor was countless other exploits you so graciously gave people a meager slap on the wrist for. So why the leap of insanity now?

----Oh, and also, I got an e-mail regarding my situation and I was told that the ban is perm mainly because you cannot figure out how much I benefited from the exploit or how many were affected. So.. if that is the case? Why aren't people who buy 1000k from bots permabanned instead of the 72 hour slap on the wrist? Isn't that a shocking blow on the economy on a quick and constant pace? Or the whole dupping fiasco? Seriously. Put this in perspective.. like I've said in my e-mails as well.. strip my characters buck naked, give away ALL MY STUFF, the stuff I earned fair and square and the 15 or so green Mallyx weapons I kept [kept them all btw], give it to the poor. I don't care. Just leave me broke and naked but with my account and HoM after 72 hours like most harsh bans.

For some, we see a pattern of movement to the outpost (sometimes after selling passage to others), entering the Mallyx room, killing him, then wash, rinse, and repeat. And boy oh boy, did some people repeat it!
----And I did. Not nearly as much as some, in the teens, I won't deny that at all. But the first 8 at least were actually under the pretense that this was how DoA worked since I had just finally beaten DoA and got my trophy. The last one? Exploited. But not under the belief that it was a hacked client. I figured it was much like early Duncan. Remember him? Hey! Can I get a show of hands for those banned for those early Duncan runs? Um.. no, no hands?! How about for ferrying people to the consulate docks? Where are my hands?! Get my point?

Yes, we have records, and chat logs, and more. Obviously, anyone who hacked his client needs to be banned, and anyone using this exploit more than a few of times also needs to be banned. Let's not fine-grain this to who did the actual hacking -- the question is, did you benefit from using the hack?
The existence of the outpost -- in hidden form -- is required to offer the Domain of Anguish. This was not a "test" and the outpost absolutely could not be "deleted when we were finished with 'testing" or "saved on some storage device." So as directly as I can say it to those offering unfounded opinions: Deleting the outpost disables the entire Domain of Anguish mission. Therefore, let's be fair and not blame ArenaNet because someone hacked his client!
----See, this is where I think you go overboard and can be rather slanderous. I'm not a hacker. I don't know a hacker. I don't associate with hackers. I'M NOT A HACKER. So don't throw the criminal terminology around so loosely as if 117 people hacked into it and we all are some modern-day Crash Override and Acid Burn. [Hackers unite!]

----Also, if you have chats, logs, and other means.. can't you see my account fluctuations over the past month? You'd see how little I affected the precious economy.

This exploit has nothing to do with texture changes or mods.
Now, to those who suggest that Support should give a warning before a block or ban, can you please tell me why that would be a good idea? Because I think I can tell you why it would be a poor idea: Giving a warning allows players time to shuffle their items to another account, to create a mule to carry the goods, or to sell them or give them away before they're caught. That means the economic impact remains, and it's the economic impact that we must prevent.
----Then where are the permabans for money purchasers? 72 hours for them, I know for a damn fact. And those, along with the farm bots, are your major economic destabilizers and you know that. So find another excuse for overreacting and ruining 117 people's days and hard-earned, now-not-so-well-spent dollars. The economic angle doesn't fly for people with common sense.

This exploit is not in any way a form of "farming." Whether someone used an exploit, or partied with someone who did, he were taken to a hidden outpost, which he could easily verify because (a) it was not on his map, (b) Mallyx, in normal gameplay, has no such outpost, and (c) he was almost certainly told it was an exploit, or told to keep it quiet, or sworn to secrecy. He was not farming, he was using or benefiting from the use of a serious exploit.
The length of the UA, or not reading it, is truly not a defense if one chooses to breach it.
----(a) Don't use the map in DoA. I'm in DoA, why bother?
(b) I didn't know that. Many didn't know that. But it is rather apparent A-Net doesn't care about the actual people involved in this one.
(c) I was told it was an exploit well after the breaking point for your vague rules, I assume. So, I guess I was SOL from the point of naivety onward.
(d) Then use the UA fairly and not use it whenever you feel the need to exercise it. Either you permaban Duncan runners etc etc.. or you don't. You didn't. You set the bar and you set it low. Not our fault. Raising it up a few notches? Justifiable. Raising it high enough to crush someone's windpipe out of the blue? More than a tad exaggerated.

Saying "They let such-and-such bug/glitch/exploit go, so they should just let everything go" has no foundation in logic. This was a significant exploit, higher in overall concern than someone ferrying another player to a legitimate high-level map. This is hacking the client; this is going to forbidden areas; this is gaining undeserved reward; this is profiting from selling the secret or selling a ferry; this is engaging in activities that can have long-ranging negative effect on the game economy.
----I wouldn't let it go. I think 72 hours is the set ban. Hell, like I said before.. this is far less an economic mess than the daily bots you all allow to run rampant on the servers at will. But for every bot banned, another needs to buy an account. Interesting, isn't it?

We are always very sorry when we have to enact a ban on any account. Although 117 accounts is a very small number when you consider the numbers of those playing every day, it still causes us great distress to be placed in the position of having to enact such bans. After all, the last thing we want to do is turn away people who enjoy our game. I am personally very, very sad to see some names that I recognize involved in this exploit.
----No it doesn't. If you were sorry, you wouldn't have reacted like a wolverine trapped in a burlap sack. Many of these people were diehard GW players who put a lot of time and effort into making GW a fun place. No offenses? Permaban? Yeah, that's the mindset of a group of very sorrow-filled people. And that, my friends, is sarcasm.

We do understand that some people will be angry about our actions, even if they were not personally involved in the exploit. I think we can all agree it's not a pleasant situation from any viewpoint. But we must put the game community as a whole above the interests of the individual player, when the actions of the individual player can have negative consequences upon all players. And that is what we have done.
----Company line that means very little to anyone with half-a-brain. You have to say that in an attempt to keep the other people agitated but still active, somewhat understanding of your harsh, Spartan-esque laws.

Players who were banned may submit an appeal. Each such appeal will be carefully and respectfully researched and I truly hope that your personal situation is such that your account might be reinstated. But in all honesty, for quite a number on the ban list, that simply will not be possible. And as distressing as it is for more than the individual players involved, some players will find their ban must be upheld, for the good of the game.
----Not a single one that I know of has gotten an appeal. Please, hands up if you did. I got a "Sorry, we can't figure out the impact you made." Which doesn't mean jack since my impact was just that: jack.

Thank you to those who support ArenaNet in making this painful decision. And our sincere thanks to those who knew of this exploit and did not use it, or who kindly reported it to us directly, so that we could prevent a major impact upon the game about which all of us care so deeply.
----And instaban you right afterwards. Ridiculous.
__________________
Gaile Gray
Community Relations Manager
ArenaNet
The Guild Wars Site
----We've spoken in-game before, and honestly, I find you to be a nice person. And perhaps you have been thrown in front of this bus. But since you are the only one that is giving anybody that is banned any sort of clarification, I had to respond to you. If I was harsh, I do apologize, as this was not wholly your decision. But it is still a decision that wreaks of unfairness and a lack of any sense of compassion to many plays who played very fair for many, many, many long hours enjoying this product.
CountAristotle is offline  
Old Jan 11, 2008, 06:02 AM // 06:02   #315
Jungle Guide
 
Lady Raenef's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Oregon, USA.
Guild: Zero Mercy [zm]
Profession: W/
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Arch the
I'm pretty sure Anet has just lost that many characters for GW2....

Done Rant THANK YOU ANET I'm going to buy WoW now. seems better
Due to probably advertisements, and all for the game, I'm sure they'll recover from the itty bitty 200 people. Besides, I'd rather not have shit like that in GW2 playing.
Lady Raenef is offline  
Old Jan 11, 2008, 06:02 AM // 06:02   #316
Ascalonian Squire
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Inde
All right, so that we can have a controlled discussion on this hot topic:


Please post your thoughts and opinions. Do not add one-liners but if you have something to add to the discussion then please do so. Any insult to an individual or the community as a whole will be deleted. Stay on topic.
I just wanna say a few stuff pretty interesting.. I found that glitch a few months ago just after finish mallyx like a normal guy and I didnt use any 3rd party programs.. either im a hacker lol.. so gg on leave a breach there.. and well some funny stuff.. I sent an email not asking why cuz I know what I did.. just asking my account situation.. after 5 mins said we have been researching and blablabla and u was involved.. ok im involved.. "but in 5 mins u researched all that stuff?" niceee! that support team rock the boat
imbanned2 is offline  
Old Jan 11, 2008, 06:02 AM // 06:02   #317
Desert Nomad
 
manitoba1073's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: ManitobaShipyards Refit and Repair Station
Guild: (SFC)Star Fleet Command,(TDE)The Daggerfall elite,(SOoM)Secret order of Magi
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pro-Monk
I have often been flamed in these forums for bringing up the FACT that this game is full of exploiters, hackers, etc. and now here's some evidence of such activity. Not only that, many of the supposedly leet (lmao) players that come on these forums and say how simple it is to beat the game, make money, etc are shown to be what they actually are - cheaters.

All I can say is - ENJOY YOUR BAN 8^)
cant agree more with you. Its 1 more down and 50+ to go. 3 more weeks till the next big one gets found out. Funny how magority ppl said this sort of stuff was impossible.
manitoba1073 is offline  
Old Jan 11, 2008, 06:03 AM // 06:03   #318
Ascalonian Squire
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: IOWA
Guild: swat
Profession: Mo/
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Destroyer1717
umm... that doesn't even make sense. 117 people got banned out of hundreds of thousands... that's not even .1% of players... and it's not hard to not do something illegal you know, considering 99.9% of people do it. And everyone won't be banned, simply because it would be terrible rep for ANet outside of the community (which continually grows more and more hostile).
Do you personally have 100k 250ectos and have all 30 titles in game I doubt it the only people I know used some sort of exploit or ebayed some gold to get the titles and weapons that they wanted The GW economy is too bloated and nobody can buy anything that they want without taking another 6months of their time to make that kind of money what do you think the players that used this exploit spent their money on weapons and thats to the lucky guy that got a eternal blade or somthing or their buying creme brulees and buy their sweet tooth title their helping the economy not destroying it all these weapons are going to just go up in price and no one can sell them and no one is going to buy them. unless you litterly have no life and actually have time to farm doa over and over and over and over to get the money
Azarr#1 is offline  
Old Jan 11, 2008, 06:12 AM // 06:12   #319
Desert Nomad
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Québec
Guild: Legacy of Angels [Halo]
Profession: E/
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Arch the
well lets just do a little 6th grade math.
Lets say all these ppl had 3 games and 1 expansion thats like 50$ each so 200$(more if you have CE's)

so 117x200$= 23400$ Anet just basiclly stole.

minus 200 from that final because there was ONLY 1 person who Hacked GW.

I'm pretty sure Anet has just lost that many characters for GW2....

Done Rant THANK YOU ANET I'm going to buy WoW now. seems better
1. Anet did not "steal" anything.. they simply enforced their UA..
2. GW2 will not suffer in sales because of 117 bans in GW.
3. "omg I'm gonna buy WoW now!" comments are laughable at best.. im certain anet is quite please to know that cheaters are going to go ruin some other game and not theirs.
Molock is offline  
Old Jan 11, 2008, 06:12 AM // 06:12   #320
Desert Nomad
 
deluxe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Monkeyball Z
Guild: S.K.A.T. [Ban]
Profession: Mo/
Default

Hah, all these high rollers banned... I bet a shitload of players with these stacks of armbraces are removed from the game
Imo, ban or remove the stacks from second accounts aswell. (based on ip's)

To all the whiners, you know you didnt deserve them armbraces, you deserved your ban instead.
deluxe is offline  
Closed Thread

Share This Forum!  
 
 
           

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Update: January 23 unienaule The Riverside Inn 15 Jan 25, 2006 01:57 AM // 01:57
Update - Friday, January 13 Ogg The Riverside Inn 2 Jan 14, 2006 01:17 AM // 01:17


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:22 AM // 11:22.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
jQuery(document).ready(checkAds()); function checkAds(){if (document.getElementById('adsense')!=undefined){document.write("_gaq.push(['_trackEvent', 'Adblock', 'Unblocked', 'false',,true]);");}else{document.write("